We make the impact accounting. You make the decision.
Name a company. Valuing Impact's experts and our AI build its impact accounts. Then ask what you need to know, and every answer traces back to its numbers.
Impact accounting for impact funds, family offices and foundations.
They already use it
10,000+ organizations assessed to date
Product film
The questions you're asked, answered.
From screening a company to briefing the board: see how each answer comes from the company's impact accounts, and how every figure traces back to its source.
2 min 45 s · Voice-over · English captions
Use cases
From first look
to final report
Pick a moment and ask its questions. The Deck answers from the company's impact accounts, and every answer links to the figures behind it.
ExamplesNutrisChat
Screening
Does this holding have a sound impact thesis and potential?
Read Net value, Pathways, Top risk, Data gaps
Go · medium confidence
Replacing animal protein in food is the thesis, and the results carry it.
Materiality, moderate. +$US 1.2M net a year, $0.19 per dollar of sales.
Harm, weak. Process heat (−$US 2.8M) alone outweighs the protein benefit (+$US 2.6M).
Verify first. The plant's heat source, the biggest swing in the result.
FY2024 · eQALY values · USD · 50 pathways
Net value · 2024
+$US 1.2M / year
- Created
- +$US 6.5M
- Offset
- −$US 5.3M
- Per $ of sales
- 0.19x
Pathways
8 largest of 50 · $M a year
- (2.8)
Process heat and fuel use
Own operations · 64.4 GWh/yr
- +2.6
Avoided animal-protein ingredients in customer foods
Products & services · 1,780 t/yr
- (2.0)
Purchased fava beans for ingredient production
Supply chain · 7,530 t/yr
- +0.7
Supplier livelihood from contracted fava demand
Supply chain · 500 farmers
- +0.5
Payroll taxes and social contributions
Own operations · $0.8M/yr
- +0.4
Higher dietary fiber intake in finished foods
Products & services · 265K consumers
- +0.2
Plant workforce wages
Own operations · 69 FTE
- (0.1)
Inbound crop transport to the Croatian plant
Supply chain · 853K t·km/yr
Top risk
Fava sourcing concentrated in one region
Weather or price shocks there hit the sourcing cost and supply first.
Top opportunity
More regenerative farmland in contracts
A larger regenerative share turns part of the sourcing cost into gains for the land.
Data gaps
Heat source and fuel mix at the plant Priority 5/5
The process-heat pathway assumes a fuel mix. The real one is the biggest swing in the result.
Fava sourcing by region Priority 3/5
Regional yields and farming practices set the sourcing cost.
Method
Why you can trust the answer.
Every answer comes from an impact valuation model. Most impact reporting counts activities, like people trained or tonnes recycled, and stops there. The model follows each activity to what it changes for people and the planet, and values that in money, so you can compare companies and weigh trade-offs.
How the method worksA method with a track record.
Valuing Impact's eQALY method has two decades of practice behind it, including work for Novartis, Nestlé, Natura, Suzano and Target. It follows the Capitals Coalition's Capitals Protocol.
A model built from the ground up.
Each company gets its own valuation model: what it does, the outcomes each activity causes and what they are worth, built from its reports, public data and databases such as ecoinvent. Every input shows its source or the assumption behind it.
Benefits and harms, on one scale.
Health, wages, climate, nature and taxes are valued in money on one scale, harms as well as benefits, across the whole value chain. You see the trade-offs instead of a single score.
Yours to take away.
Download the model to Excel at any time, with live formulas and every source. Change an input and the results recalculate, so your analysts can check it outside the platform.
Frameworks & Sources
Capitals Protocol
Impact Value Standards BoardThe model
Under every answer, a full model.
Behind the Deck sits a complete impact valuation model, built and linked automatically. This is Nutris's: every pathway, the equation that values it, and the sources behind it.
Point at a pathway to see its equation and the sources behind it.
Who runs it
Start with our experts. Scale with yours.
Every analysis follows Valuing Impact’s method. You choose who applies it, and you can change as your team grows.
Compare the optionsWe run it for you.
A Valuing Impact consultant scopes each company with you. The AI builds the accounts, and the consultant reviews every model before it reaches you. Your team only reads the answers in the Deck.
Screen a list · Decide on a deal · Steer a portfolio
Or bring it in-house.
When you're ready, your own analyst takes over in the Model: adding pathways, fixing numbers, calibrating assumptions. We train them and stay on call. The method and the audit trail stay the same.
Run it yourself · license with training and support
Customer perspective
What changed when Wilstar started valuing impact?
Hear from Marcus Bleasdale, managing director of the non-profit venture Wilstar, or explore our product demos, software walkthroughs and resources.
Explore the resourcesMarcus Bleasdale · Managing Director · Wilstar
See what impact accounting tells you about your next investment
Open an example company in the Deck and ask it anything. When you are ready, tell us which company is next: Valuing Impact builds its accounts with you.
Prefer to talk first? Write to Samuel at sv@impactaccounting.ai
Get the latest insights straight to your inbox
By signing up to receive emails from ImpactAccounting.ai, you agree to our Privacy Policy. We treat your info responsibly. Unsubscribe anytime.
About us
From leaders in impact accounting.
The technological evolution of Valuing Impact, founded by Samuel Vionnet on two decades of impact valuation experience and encoded into software with Olivier Küng, deep-tech entrepreneur.
We're hiring. Join us
Samuel Vionnet
Co-founder
Olivier Küng
Co-founder